
The other evening at the Salvation Army, which I was striking it rich on the trousers and blouses departments, I walked past a very large painting. I stopped and looked at it again. It was muddy-colored and just giving it a quick glance, thought to myself that it was painted in oils. There was a bronzed plaque on the bottom that read "Olvera Street", and another "J. Laycox." It was $50. It was too 1960s for me. And the muddiness made me sad. I didn't know if it needed a good cleaning, but I was in a rush, so forgot about it until the next day.
It turns out that William "Jack" Laycox was a well-known watercolorist, born and raised in California. Despite his travels around the world, he was best known for his watercolors of California scenes.
And one of his big paintings sold for nearly $2,000.
My heart beat fast. I was able to find all kinds of Laycox auctions that had brought very nice prices, but nowhere did I find any reference to "Olvera Street".
The next day I went back to the thrift store. The painting was still in the window and it suddenly struck me that this was likely not a painting. I got it out of the window. I cringed that it was in the window, getting the heat and sun all day. I laid the painting flat and saw yes, that what had seemed to be blobs of paint were in fact raised spots in the heavy paper. I took off my glasses and leaned in. Yep. It was a lithograph. A dirty lithograph with a couple of scratches across it.
I put it back.
But I'm still thinking about the fact that nowhere in Maitre Laycox's oeuvre is there mention of Olvera Street.
-----
Oh. And just to add a non-sequiter "isn't it weird" thing to this, I found my grandfather's photography on sale on line for prices that made me gasp.
I have mixed emotions about this.
Part of me says that the work of the child molester and destroyer of lives should be gathered up and burned, along with the negatives.
Another part of me says that he's been dead for nearly twenty years. Destroying the photographs won't un-destroy those lives.
I've finally been able to shrug about it and mostly move on. There's just still one tiny part of me that thinks it's not a good thing that his work is still out there. And selling for nearly as much as a J. Laycox watercolor.
